| "Cooperative
Advertising and Pricing in a Dynamic Stochastic Supply Chain: Feedback Stackelberg Strategies
" |
Xiuli He, University of Texas at Dallas, USA.
|
|
Cooperative (co-op) advertising is an important
instrument for aligning manufacturer and retailer decisions in supply
chains. In this, the manufacturer announces a co-op advertising policy,
i.e., a participation rate that specifies the percentage of the
retailer's advertising expenditure that it will provide. In addition, it
also announces the wholesale price. In response, the retailer chooses
its optimal advertising and pricing policies. We model this supply chain
problem as a stochastic Stackelberg differential game whose dynamics
follows Sethi's stochastic sales-advertising model. We obtain the
condition when offering co-op advertising is optimal for the
manufacturer. We provide in feedback form the optimal advertising and
pricing policies for the manufacturer and the retailer. We contrast the
results with the advertising and price decisions of the vertically
integrated channel, and suggest a method for coordinating the channel. |
| Advisor:
Dr. Suresh P. Sethi |
|
Go Back
|
| "Absorptive
Capability of MNCs: Balance between Autonomy and Control of Foreign R&D
Subsidiaries'" |
Seiko Arai, Templeton College, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
|
|
This paper analyzes the capability of Japanese and European multinational companies (MNCs) to absorb technological knowledge from the United States through their R&D operation in the US. Employing the notion of “absorptive capacity” [10], we define the capability of a firm to absorb technological knowledge from abroad as “absorptive capability (AC).” We examine the components of AC and their inter-relationships using patent and sales data in the context of R&D management of Japanese and European MNCs at home and in the US. |
| Advisor:
Dr. David Barron |
|
Go Back
|
| "Public Sector
Science and ‘The Strategy of the Commons'" |
Ajay Agrawal, Queen’s University, Boston,
Massachusetts. USA
|
|
This paper provides a game-theoretic
explanation for the puzzling behavior of large firms (incumbents) who,
while sponsoring university research labs, require all inventions
generated by the sponsored labs be licensed openly on a purely
non-exclusive basis. Under certain conditions, this results in an
intellectual property “commons” with the consequence that no firm has
the incentive to innovate, despite the potential profitability of the
new technology. The strategy of spoiling incentives to innovate by
eliminating exclusive intellectual property rights - the strategy of the
commons - is motivated by a fear of cannibalization and supported by a
credible threat. The author shows that the degree of cannibalization to
which the new technology exposes the old market is responsible for this
market failure and the author characterizes the sub-game perfect
equilibrium in which “the strategy of the commons” is played. Within
this framework welfare implications as well as strategy and policy
issues are also investigated. |
| Advisor:
Dr. Iain
Cockburn |
|
Go Back
|
| "Improving Information
Technology Systems through Adaptive User Interfaces" |
| Roger E. Brill,
University of Central Florida, USA |
| The "information overload"
problem anticipated for the future will be compounded as information
expands exponentially in the next millenium. This paper describes past
and present research efforts designed to improve information technology
(IT) systems through the creation of adaptive user interfaces. |
|
Advisor: Dr. James M. Ragusa |
Go Back
|
| "Strategies for Managing
Process Improvement Uncertainty in Manufacturing Environments" |
|
Janice Carrillo,
Georgia Institute of Technology, USA |
|
Although
firms must upgrade their manufacturing capabilities to remain
competitive over time, successful process improvement implementation is
uncertain. Furthermore, several internal characteristics such as the
firm’s size and level of knowledge affect the magnitude and the
certainty of the benefits realized. A comprehensive stochastic model is
introduced which yields managerial insights concerning the impact of
firm size on appropriate process improvement and knowledge acquisition
strategies. Analytic results are derived linking firm size to relevant
cost and efficiency advantages. Manufacturing managers can utilize the
model to tailor appropriate process improvement and knowledge
acquisition strategies for their firms. |
|
Advisor: Dr. Cheryl Gaimon |
Go Back
|
| “The
Role of Uncertainty in Speed-to-Market and New Product Success” |
Jiyao Chen, Stevens Institute of Technology,
Hoboken, New Jersey, USA
Co-Authors: Richard Reilly, Gary Lynn |
|
Time-based strategy is becoming an important weapon to
achieve competitive advantages in the current environment of fast-changing
technology and customer requirements. Speed-to-market has become the mantra
of both researchers and practitioners in new product development (NPD), but
there is limited empirical research and inconsistent or conflicting findings
on the relationship between speed-to-market and product performance. A more
important question is whether faster is always better. In a study of 692 NPD
projects, we examined the relationship between speed-to-market and new
product success (NPS) under conditions of different uncertainties. Our
results indicate that speed-to-market is generally positively associated
with overall project success, but market turbulence moderates the direct
effect. Speed-to-market is less important to NPS under conditions of low
market turbulence. One important implication is that it is necessary to
execute time-based strategy in a fast-changing market but not in an existing
and stable marketing. Our results also suggest technological uncertainty
does not affect the speed-success relationship. The limitations, and future
research related to these results are discussed. |
|
Advisor: Dr. Richard Reilly |
|
Go Back
|
| "Optimal Sequential and
Parallel Prototyping Policies" |
|
Ely Dahan,
Stanford University, USA |
|
When designing a new product or service, its
developers must balance the expected profit of improving the design
against the costs and time requirements of doing so. We propose to
quantify this tradeoff by modeling a latter stage of development,
prototyping, as a search process. The decision maker choose how many
prototypes to build then observe the projected profit of each. Multiple
parallel prototypes are modeled as n random draws from a continuous
probability distribution. The model balances the cost of building and
testing the parallel prototypes against improvements in expected
profits. We also study the option to abandon the project when even the
best prototype generates losses. Further, we investigate prototyping
decisions for products consisting of independent components that must be
compatible in order for the total system to be profitable. Process
design also considers alternatives for improving particular process
steps but is complicated by the need for compatibility between these
improved process steps.
The paper’s contributions include closed-form
solutions for the case of Uniformly and Gumbel-distributed profits,
insights into the benefits of conducting multiple experiments in
parallel versus sequentially, and the valuation of options to abandon
projects. It develops insight into the interactions between multiple
components of a complex product or manufacturing process as they affect
prototyping policy.
|
|
Advisor Dr. Haim Mendelson |
Go Back
|
| “An Analytical Approach to Building a Technology
Development Envelope (TDE) for Roadmapping of Emerging Technologies” |
Nathasit Gerdsri, Portland State University, Portland,
Oregon, USA
Co-Author: Dundar F. Kocaoglu |
|
This paper presents the research on the development of
a new concept and methodology called Technology Development Envelope (TDE).
TDE approach is applied for identifying the optimum path in developing a technology
roadmap in which technology strategies and business strategies are combined. TDE
allows the executive level decision makers in corporations, as well as the
policy level decision makers in governments to incorporate disruptive technologies and
radical innovations in the development of technology strategies. The combination
of Delphi method and hierarchical decision (AHP) is used as a foundation for building
the TDE concept. The judgments from technology developers and technology
implementers are utilized in the process to assure that the technology strategies
are in full support of corporate goals and objectives. |
|
Advisor: Dr. Dundar F. Kocaoglu |
|
Go Back
|
| “Strategic
Evaluation of Emerging Technologies in the Taiwan Semiconductor Foundry
Industry” |
Jonathan Ho, Portland State University, Portland,
Oregon, USA
Co-Author: Dundar F. Kocaoglu |
|
The Integrated Circuit (IC) manufacturing technologies
have been evolving continuously since their invention. The semiconductor
foundry industry, whose core business is IC manufacturing, is greatly
influenced and shaped by the flow of these newly arriving technologies. This
research applies the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) model to evaluate the
strategic impact of new IC manufacturing technologies in the semiconductor
foundry industry in Taiwan where the industry is in a global leadership
position. The model incorporates the levels of overall competitive success,
competitive goals, technology strategies and emerging technologies. Relative
impacts of elements in one level on its upper level are obtained by
utilizing the inputs from experts of Taiwan’s semiconductor foundry
industry. The results show the relative importance of competitive goals in
the semiconductor foundry industry. Each competitive goal is aligned to the
technology strategies as well as emerging technologies in the prioritized
orders. |
|
Advisor: Dr. Dundar F. Kocaoglu |
|
Go Back
|
|
"Educating the Guess: Strategies, Concepts and Tools for the Fuzzy Front
End of Product Development" |
|
Antonie J. Jetter,
Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen-Germany |
|
Many companies lack efficient management of the early
phases of new product development (NPD) - the so-called fuzzy front end (FFE).
Rather than on structured methods, decision makers rely on “gut–feel” or
“guessing”. In an attempt to “educate the guess,” this paper discusses the
activities and challenges of the FFE, as well as strategies to manage them
successfully. It then briefly presents traditional and recent approaches to
front-end management support. Based on the identified strengths and
weaknesses of existing front-end solutions, the framework of a new
management support system for the FFE is presented. Conceptually, the system
is based on psychological findings about the process of action-regulation in
complex decision environments. Methodologically, it uses Fuzzy Cognitive
Maps (FCM) for modeling and simulation.
|
| Advisor: Dr. Hans-Horst Schröeder |
 |
Dipl.-Kff. Antonie Jetter studied business
administration at RWTH Aachen, where she graduated in 1998. She has
worked with Siemens AG and a start-up laser company and joined the
Department of Technology and Innovation Management at the RWTH Aachen in
1998. She is currently working on her Ph.D. thesis concerned with
information acquisition and processing in the early NPD phases. Her
present research interests also include knowledge management and small
and medium enterprises |
|
|
|
|
Go Back
|
| "Achieving the Potential
Benefits of Advanced Manufacturing Technology - A Study of Swedish
Metalworking Companies" |
| Patrik Johnsson,
Växjö University, Sweden |
|
The paper empirically concludes that a key to success
for heavy users of advanced manufacturing technology is to improve the
infrastructure (worker empowerment, training, self-managed teams,
quality leadership and inter-functional design teams), to emphasize
decentralized preventive maintenance, and to develop a manufacturing
strategy where flexibility is an important capability. |
|
Advisor: Dr. David J. Sherwin |
Go Back
|
| “Broadcast Search in Problem Solving: Attracting Solutions from the Periphery” |
Karim R. Lakhani, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA
|
|
The purpose of this study is to explore an alternative mechanism of problem solving
that focuses on broadcasting problems to diverse and peripheral problem solvers, what I call broadcast
search. Broadcasting problems is a radical departure from traditional problem solving as it involve problem
holders engaging in as little problem-solving as possible - instead they attempt to interest a heterogeneous
set of external actors in creating solutions to internal problems. Analysis of 166 previously unsolved
science problems, originating from the R&D labs of 26 firms, revealed a 29.5% resolution rate via broadcast
search. The probability of a problem being solved was significantly correlated with the heterogeneity in
the scientific interests of the solvers submitting solutions and their relative specialization. Broadcast
search also appears to be an economically efficient problem solving mechanism. It involves low costs for
solution seekers relative to the costs of internal R&D. Most of the solvers based their submissions,
partially or fully, on previously developed solutions from their own and/or someone else’s work, implying
an efficient re-use and transformation of existing knowledge and solutions. |
| Advisor: Dr. Eric von Hippel |
 |
Dr. Karim R. Lakhani joined the Technology and Operations Management Unit
at Harvard Business School as an assistant professor in July 2006. He
specializes in the management of technological innovation and product
development in firms and communities. His research is on distributed
innovation systems and the movement of innovative activity to the edges
of organizations and into communities. He has extensively studied the
emergence of open source software communities and their unique innovation
and product development strategies. He has also investigated how critical
knowledge from outside of the organization can be found and put to use
inside for innovation in the biotechnology, life sciences and industrial
chemicals industries. He is co-editor of Perspectives on Free and Open
Source Software (MIT Press, 2005).
Dr. Lakhani was awarded his PhD in management from the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology (MIT) in 2006. He also holds a M.S. degree
in Technology and Policy from MIT (1999), and a B.S. degree in
Electrical Engineering and Management from McMaster University in
Canada (1993). He was a recipient of the Aga Khan Foundation International
Scholarship and a four-year doctoral fellowship from Canada's Social
Science and Humanities Research Council. |
|
|
|
|
Go Back
|
| “Knowledge-Partitioning and Inter-firm Innovation:
An Empirical Case Analysis” |
Jaegul Lee, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,
USA
Co-Author: Francisco Veloso |
|
Building on emerging research on knowledge
partitioning and an information processing view of product development, this
study examines the impact of task uncertainty on the knowledge boundary between
manufacturers and suppliers in automobile industry. Using successfully applied patents in
automobile emission control technologies from 1970 to 1998, this research shows that
manufacturers expand their inhouse R&D capabilities beyond architectural knowledge and into component
innovation whenever they encountered task uncertainties. Moreover, and unlike what was
anticipated, manufacturers’ endeavor in building up inhouse component innovation was shown to increase
over time, indicating a growing importance of component knowledge for manufacturers in times of
task uncertainties, even after the establishment of dominant designs. This study also provides a large
scale empirical test for the theoretical claims that effective knowledge management for both architectural
and component knowledge is a key factor influencing firms’ competitiveness in the inter-firm product
developments. |
|
Advisor: Professor Francisco Veloso |
|
Go Back
|
| “Optimal Project Selection and Budget Allocation for
R&D Portfolio” |
Leonardo P. Santiago, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Co-Author: Pirooz Vakili |
|
We introduce a new formulation of the problem of
project selection and budget allocation for R&D portfolios. Due to R&D budget constraints
and limited resources, firms are often forced to select a subset of all potential
idea/products to carry on the development process. In the formulation presented we make
a distinction between budget constraints during the development phase and the
commercialization phase by arguing that the latter constraints are not hard
constraints. Firms that succeed in developing promising and breakthrough products
have little difficulty in securing resources for their commercialization. The portfolio selection at the
commercialization phase therefore can appropriately be treated as an instance of selection among a set of
financial instruments and the rich theory of financial portfolio formation can be utilized. Optimal selection
of projects at the development phase, on the other hand, needs to be performed with the optimal selection
at the commercialization phase taken into account. Following this line of argument, we formulate a two
stage optimal project selection and budget allocation problem. Properties of the solution and the
implications of adopting this formulation are discussed. Project interdependencies at both stages of
development and commercialization are considered and illustrated via examples. |
|
Advisor: Professor Pirooz Vakili |
|
Go Back
|
| "Managing International
Technology Alliances: Ballard Power and Fuel Cell Vehicle Development" |
| Wilma W. Suen,
Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, USA |
|
Multiparty international
strategic alliances are becoming popular vehicles through which firms
access resources, share risk, and learn. They are particularly useful in
technology-based industries where products are becoming more complex and
risk of failure is high. However, firms are profit maximizing actors who
may behave opportunistically or defect in order to gain a larger share
of the returns. This paper argues that power and interdependence between
members, and between the firm and the alliance are key to determining a
member’s capability to act against its partners’ or alliance’s
interests. The more powerful and less dependent the firm, the greater
its freedom to act. The case of Ballard’s alliance with DaimlerChrysler
and Ford finds that alliances “construct” interdependence to balance the
asymmetries in their relationships and tie the firms more closely
together. |
| Advisor: Dr. Lee McKnight |
| |
Go Back
|
| "Innovation Forecasting" |
| Robert Watts,
Georgia Institute of Technology, USA |
|
Technological forecasting is premised on a certain
orderliness of the innovation process. Myriad studies of technological
substitution, diffusion, and transfer processes have yielded conceptual
models of what matters for successful innovation. Yet most technological
forecasts key on limited empirical measures quite divorced from those
innovation process models. We glean a number of concepts from various
innovation models, then present an array of bibliometric measures that
offer promise of operationalizing these concepts. Judicious combination
of such bibliometrics with other forms of evidence offers an enriched
form of technological forecasting that we name “innovation forecasting.”
This provides a good means to combine technological trends, mapping of
technological interdependencies, and competitive intelligence to produce
a viable forecast. We illustrate by assessing prospects for ceramic
engine technologies. |
|
Advisor: Dr. Alan Porter |
Go Back
|
| "A Yield Management
Strategy for Semiconductor Manufacturing Based on Information Theory" |
Charles Weber,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA
Co-Authors:
Vijay Sankaran, SEMATECH
Kenneth W. Tobin, Jr., Oak Ridge National Laboratories
Gary Scher, Sleuthworks, Inc.
|
|
A model based on information theory, which allows
technology managers to choose the optimal strategies for yield
management in the semiconductor industry, is presented. The knowledge
extraction rate per experimentation cycle and knowledge extraction rate
per unit time serve as benchmarking metrics for yield learning. They
enable managers to make objective comparisons of apparently unrelated
technologies. Combinations of four yield analysis tools -- electrical
testing, automatic defect classification, spatial signature analysis and
wafer position analysis -- are examined in detail to determine an
optimal yield management strategy for both the R&D and volume production
environments. |
|
Advisor: Dr. Eric von Hippel |
Go Back
|
|
"Technology
Processes Management Capability Profiles of Machine Manufacturers in
Turkey" |
|
O.Ugur Yildirim,
Yeditepe
University, Istanbul, Turkey
Co-Authors: A. Nuri Basoglu,
Bogazici University, Turkey
|
|
Technology Processes Management
Capability Profiles Model (TPMCPM) integrates normative, strategic, and
operational technology management levels with technology management
subprocesses (identification, selection, acquisition, exploitation,
protection, and abandonment of technology). This research aims to assess
technology management capabilities and draw capability profiles of the
machine manufacturing industry in Turkey. |
| Advisor: Dr. M. Atilla Oner |
Go Back
|
| “Managing the Technology of Integrating the
Production and Transportation Functions in Assembly or Flow Operations for Make-to-order Industries” |
Xuying Zhao, University of Texas at Dallas, USA
Co-Author: Kathryn E. Stecke |
|
When a make-to-order manufacturing company
commits a delivery due date for an order, we call it a commit-to-delivery business mode.
In this mode, the manufacturing company is responsible for the shipping
cost and selecting a shipping mode which is usually provided by a third party logistics company.
Generally, shipping cost is higher when the selected shipping mode requires shorter shipping time.
How should a company schedule production in production lines for all accepted orders so that the
company can leave enough shipping time for orders to take slow shipping modes to reduce
the shipping cost? We study the production and transportation integration technology for a
make-to-order manufacturing company with a commit-todelivery business mode. In the
distribution scenario where partial delivery is allowed, we provide an optimal production schedule which
minimizes the total shipping costs for all finished orders. When partial delivery is not allowed, we
provide a near-optimal heuristic algorithm which is proved to be efficient and effective by numerical tests. |
|
Advisor: Professor Kathryn E. Stecke |
|
Go Back
|
| |